Cloning humans essay arguments

However, it is essentially asking the same thing. As people live longer and longer, the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality.

Cloning humans essay arguments

The arguments against human cloning, such as those presented in the Andrews Report, are weak, except for the safety issue. The arguments can either be applied with equal force to other ethical situations that are Cloning humans essay arguments prohibited, or are inconsistent with the three principles listed above.

It is a simple matter to rebut these arguments, which seem to have influenced the clauses in the PHC Act. The Andrews Report lists some arguments against human cloning. It is undisputed that cloning is currently an untested technology.

Safety is the only valid argument against human cloning. If any technology is unsafe, it should not be permitted until the safety risks are managed. For reproductive cloning, this could mean being as safe as IVF technology for example. However, the question that ought to be asked is what the ethical status of human reproductive cloning should be if the technology were accepted to be as safe, for example, as IVF technology.

If human cloning were accepted to be safe next year, why should it then not be permitted? What disasters will befall us? The Andrews Report refers to Professors Trounson and Williamson arguing that there is no medical reason for reproductive cloning.

There are no medical reasons for eating chocolates, driving cars, using IVF technology or adopting children, but none of these are prohibited. There are biological and social reasons, other than medical reasons, for human cloning. Childless couples would be able to use cloning technology, and for many of them this may be preferable to IVF or surrogacy arrangements.

IVF with sperm donors is not for everyone, but it is nonetheless permitted for those who want it. That there may not be any medical reasons for reproductive cloning is in essence irrelevant.

Identical twins are natural clones. Identical twins should be prohibited if this dignity argument has any merit, but there have been no moves in modern times to prohibit twins.

The human dignity argument seems to be premised on the concept of genetic determinism, that people are equated to their genes. However, genetic determinism is false, many factors combine to determine who a person is.

As a hypothetical situation, imagine a couple who had two embryos preserved after an IVF procedure. They had these embryos tested, and genomes checked. One embryo had an extremely severe genetic defect and the other had the identical genome to an existing person this is of course extremely improbable in reality.

Would anybody actually propose that the genetically damaged embryo be grown to full term, rather than cloning the existing person? If cloning an existing person is acceptable here, this counterexample shows there is no valid dignity argument against cloning.

And clones should not be discriminated against Principle 2. So there is no problem with human cloning, unless one has preconceived intentions to discriminate against it. Some would argue that a cloned child is a means to an end. Everybody who intentionally conceives a child does so for a reason, whether it is to raise a child to love and nurture, propagate their genes, support themselves in their old age, bear a child on a significant date for example 1 Januaryconform to peer or parental pressure, or mistakenly help save a marriage.

Two points should be made. When a child is born, the child is an end, not a means to an end. Every person is an autonomous being worthy of respect, and children do not exist for the benefit of parents. A cloned child could actually enhance the family relationship for otherwise childless couples.

Cloning humans essay arguments

An adopted person, or one produced through IVF technology if produced using donor sperm or eggsor through a surrogacy agreement, is also not a biological descendent of its parents. But we do not prohibit children who are adopted or produced through IVF technology or consider them unethical.

It really is not difficult to understand how a clone fits into a family. The re are many instances of unusual family relationships.

Stepsiblings would then also be cousins the normal understanding of siblings has changedbut that this might be unusual and confound some people does not compel us to seek to prohibit such a scenario.

If this is all too confusing for some people, education rather than regulation is the appropriate response.Cloning in general has been a rising debate across the globe since before Dolly the sheep was cloned in The success of being able to clone an animal brought scientists to wonder about a more challenging task, cloning humans.

Argument Against Human Cloning essays The idea of cloning humans has always stirred debate, raising moral and ethical issues.

Cloning humans essay arguments

As research and experiments continue delve into the frontiers of technology and science, we inch closer to the possibility of cloning becoming a reality.

Cloning Human Beings: An Assessment of the Ethical Issues Pro and Con In Dan W. Brock's essay, Cloning human beings: an assessment of the ethical issues pro and con, Brock tries to take a neutral stance on the subject and give both the positives and negatives of cloning human beings.

Is human cloning ethical? This is the subject of this brief essay which takes the position that cloning is unethical and should not be allowed in the society. Cloning involves producing a group of cells or organisms that are identical, and which all originate from the same primary organism.

Cloning in general has been a rising debate across the globe since before Dolly the sheep was cloned in The success of being able to clone an animal brought scientists to wonder about a more challenging task, cloning alphabetnyc.com consideration is morally wrong and should not be stood for.

Cloning (Argumentative Essay Sample) May 16, by admin Essay Samples, This is the subject of this brief essay which takes the position that cloning is unethical and should not be allowed in the society. While the end result bears some benefit to humans as describe below, the cloning procedure sets out loads of ethical questions.

Human Cloning: Moral Arguments | Essay Example