Martinez and Grgory Vincent http: Is the practice of involuntary outpatient commitment used more often with African-Americans than whites? And if so, what does that mean? It was an important question to answer seven years ago.
It is not, has never been, nor will ever be, a Wikipedia policy or guideline.
Rather, it illustrates standards or conduct that are generally not accepted by the Wikipedia community. Some discussions are born lame; some achieve lameness; some have lameness thrust upon them.
Upon coming across a discussion that is borderline lame, some Wikipedians may be tempted to go do something useful. This is a big mistake. Left to its own devices, the discussion might inadvertently become useful. It is essential that as many editors as possible chime in, not adding to the discussion at hand, but merely commenting how lame it is and what a big waste of time it is.
See Self-fulfilling prophecyPositive feedbackand Exponential growth.
Merely stating the discussion is lame is frequently not sufficient; every opposing statement must be denied with increasingly vehement assertions of the lameness. While at first blush, wasting time whining about what a waste of time something is may seem illogical, the inherent irony just magnifies the lameness.
An additional step to increase lameness is to include repeated links to this essay, which is WP: The best way to set about a lame edit war is to change a large number of articles based on your interpretation of minutiae in the manual of style.
If this does not work, try changing the MOS itself; that always works. Guidelines on how to add an entry to this guide If you want to add a "lame edit war" to this page, keep the following in mind: It must have been an actual edit war.
Discussions on talk pages, even over trivially lame details, are not "edit wars" and should NEVER be added: Note that pithy quotes on talk pages may be suitable for Wikipedia: It should truly be amongst the lamest edit wars.
Not just garden-variety lame. Unless a participant is banned for their part in the edit war, do not give the names of participants or link to their userpages. Be careful to avoid even the semblance of taking sides in the war.
If you feel that an edit war was truly lame, add it! The lameness of it should speak for itself.
Of course, editors with a more experienced eye for lameness may disagree with your claim to the "lamest," which may just result in yet another lame edit war! Note that the no original research and verifiability policies are meant to apply to the article namespacenot necessarily on pages like this in the Wikipedia project namespace.
This is intended for the community rather than your average readers. Humorous, insightful commentary is encouraged here. Ethnic and national feuds.This research is based upon the most recent available data in Facts from earlier years are cited based upon availability and relevance, not to slant results by singling out specific years that are different from others.
Gun Crime Essay Persuasive Writing. Words Apr 28th, 14 Pages. Show More. According to gun control facts, in the year , almost 39 percent of the population of America voted to ban guns and other firearms in the United States.
The reason - the perceived view that it is the lack of gun control that has resulted is the number of.
met the man who said those words while working as a bartender in the Ozark Mountains of northwest Arkansas. It was a one-street town in Benton County. 1. Banning guns works, which is why New York, DC, & Chicago cops need guns. 2. Washington DC’s low murder rate of 69 per , is due to strict gun control, and Indianapolis’ high murder rate of 9 per , is due to the lack of gun control.
Assault Weapons Should Be Banned. In the present day, gun shootings are not new to our ears. The debate over gun control has been relentless with the efforts of gun control by the top people in the government falling on deaf ears. Today, gun control is under discussion everywhere.
All the tragic gun violence-related events that took place recently and not so recently led not only to grief but to all sorts of speculation on all levels.